Exteriors
A property's exterior envelope provides protection from the elements, and to a large extent conveys its historic character.
The age, style, and significance of a building or structure can often be understood by analyzing exterior designs, features, and
materials. Exterior changes in taste, fashion, architectural style, and use may also be evident. In any preservation project, it is
critical that the exterior be treated carefully. The following information describes preservation treatments and approaches for the
repair and maintenance of the exteriors of historic buildings and structures.
Roofs
Roofs are more than simply the structure protecting the interior of a building from the elements: they can be significant
design features, notable for their shape, height, color or pattern, configuration and materials.
Historic roofing materials are distinguishing elements of a building, defining overall style, and reflecting the age and design
of the property. As with all historic materials, emphasis should be on retention and repair. Many materials, such as slate or tile,
if carefully maintained can last for many years, and may need only careful attention and repair. However, since the roof is
constantly exposed to the elements, it may reach a point where partial or major replacement is necessary. If this is the case,
the historic materials should be replaced to match the existing in color, texture, size, and other visual qualities. Replacement in
like material is always the preferred choice, but if a substitute material is necessary or warranted, choosing the new to match the
historic appearance is critically important. The best course of action in maintaining a roof is periodic inspection and repair. Gutter
and flashing failure, plus lack of proper maintenance, is often the culprit in a leaky roof. Owners should carefully examine
gutters, leaders, valleys and flashing before determining that wholesale roof replacement is necessary. Any repairs at these
areas should be made using materials and techniques meant to last long-term, not simply a short-term "fix". Other materials,
such as roofing compounds, do not solve the real problem, are subject to early failure, and can be unsightly.
Masonry: Cleaning, Repointing and Repair
As with all historic materials, frequent evaluation, and careful maintenance of historic masonry can solve minor problems
before they become large expensive repairs.
Cleaning
In general, cleaning of historic masonry is not recommended, as it has the potential to cause damage. Cleaning should be
undertaken only when dirt or other material obscures significant architectural features or is causing or has the potential to cause
damage to masonry materials. Cleaning should not remove the patina which is evidence of a building or structure's history and
age, and should never be performed for the sole purpose of achieving a "new" appearance. When planning to clean an historic
building or structure, the initial assessment should evaluate the historic material, the reason for cleaning and the cleaning
method. Cleaning methods should be carefully selected to do the job without harming the historic material.
Acidic cleaners or highly alkaline cleaners can cause damage to historic materials and are generally inappropriate. Only
non-acidic neutral pH detergents should be used in conjunction with non-metallic brushes or scrapers. Water pressure for
cleaning should not exceed 150-200 psi., since higher pressures can damage historic masonry units and mortar.
Abrasive methods such as grit blasting or "sandblasting" should never be used. They are extremely damaging
to historic materials in that they accelerate the deterioration of historic masonry materials and can greatly change a building or
structure's appearance.
If masonry surfaces were painted historically, they should remain painted. This coating could have a specific protective
function or play a part in the historic design and appearance. If the covering is non-historic and deemed appropriate for removal,
it should be removed as gently as possible. Test patches should be performed prior to selecting a removal product or method,
beginning with the lowest recommended concentration of product and working upward to find the appropriate level; water
pressures should not exceed 150-200 psi.
Repointing
Repointing, the term used for repair of deteriorated mortar joints, is done by removing any old, deteriorated mortar and
replacing it with new. Repointing can be important to the continued sound physical condition of a building and has the potential
to affect the appearance of historic masonry. The removal of deteriorated mortar should be undertaken only when absolutely
necessary, usually where mortar is eroded or crumbling. Most structures built until the early 20th century used lime mortar
with little or no cement binder. Removal of these low-strength mortars should be performed using hand-held, non-power tools,
since power tools such as masonry saws have the potential to damage masonry units. Mortar made of hard Portland cement is
much more difficult to remove from joints, and use of hand-held chisels is likely to damage the masonry units. Here, carefully
controlled pneumatic chisels or small grinders may be appropriate, but these require extensive experience and quality control to
assure that the masonry units are not damaged. Complete repointing is seldom necessary, nor is it a sound preservation
treatment. New mortar should match the historic in strength, composition, color, texture, aggregate distribution and all other
qualities as determined by a laboratory analysis. Prepackaged "masonry cements" generally contain large amounts
of Portland cement, and therefore produce a very strong mortar that can be damaging to softer historic bricks and terra cotta. If
mortar analysis is not undertaken to determine the composition of the original mortar, the following soft, lime-rich mortar mix is
appropriate for use on most historic masonry: 1 part white Portland cement; 3 parts Type S hydrated lime; 6 parts sand with
no admixtures Because color additives can weaken masonry if used in large quantities, a color match is best achieved using
only appropriate colored aggregates (sand, brick dust, etc.) Equally important to mortar content is the appearance of new mortar
joints. New joints should match the historic in width, tooling, texture and profile. Special character-defining joints such as
"ruled" or "grapevine" should be repaired or reproduced carefully.
Repair
Masonry materials may require repair as well as repointing and appropriate techniques will vary according to the specific
material. Because damaged brick units are difficult to repair, replacement may be most appropriate and may involve using new
or salvaged brick. If repair is not possible and replacement is necessary, new units should match the existing in size, color,
texture and all other qualities. Historic stone materials that are damaged should be treated carefully. In keeping with the
preservation Standards, the best approach is repair. Replacement should only be considered if the material is deteriorated
beyond repair. Where cracked, spalled or exfoliated, limestone, sandstone, marble, terra cotta, cast stone or concrete materials
should be repaired to prevent further damage. The type of stone, and type and extent of damage should be determined before
the repair method is chosen. The repair should be carefully executed to match the damaged material. Information on appropriate
specific treatments for historic masonry materials can be obtained from the SHPO.
Cladding and Siding
Historic cladding materials are highly visible and significant features of a building's exterior. Different materials such as
clapboard, shingles, pressed metal, stucco and tile were used in various historic periods, and in many cases relate specifically to
a particular style. Therefore, preservation and repair of historic cladding materials is important to maintain the character of
historic buildings. Periodic inspections should be made to assess the condition of the cladding, and any necessary repairs
undertaken immediately. This approach can preventy damage or deterioration from becoming widespread, saving money in the
long run.
Any work should be carefully planned to have the least physical impact on cladding materials. Any cleaning should be
undertaken using careful, non-abrasive techniques. High pressure blasting, using either water or abrasives, can be very
damaging to historic materials and should not be used. If the cladding material requires painting or caulking, these treatments
will serve as a primary weathershield. As with all historic material, damaged sections should be replaced in-kind to match the
historic in all visual and physical qualities.
The installation of vinyl or metal siding materials over historic cladding, or the replacement of historic materials with vinyl or
metal, is not an appropriate preservation treatment. Substitute materials may dramatically alter the historic appearance and
character of a building in many ways: the width of substitute siding often does not match historic clapboard width, shadow
reveals are reduced, and trim is frequently changed or removed at cornices, corners, windows, and doors. Historic decorative
shingles or vergeboards, as well as other materials and patterns, may be completely obscured or destroyed. Moreover, substitute
siding has the potential to cause serious long-term damage to a building by trapping moisture or by covering the early signs of
deterioration that, left unchecked, can lead to major repairs and structural problems.
Foremost among potential damage concerns is the accelerated deterioration of structural elements from moisture trapped
unnoticed behind substitute materials. The moisture can drastically decrease the efficiency of insulation. Related interior
consequences include peeling paint or wallpaper and cracked wall surfaces. Substitute materials are also problematic because
repair will almost always be noticeable--the colors fade over time and products may be changed or discontinued.
When properly maintained, historic cladding materials such as clapboard and shingles are durable and serviceable; their
existence on thousands of historic buildings and structures after decades of service is proof that they are economic and
long-term alternatives. Their repair is strongly recommended.
Windows
Historic windows are among the most important features in defining a building or structure's character, and proper treatment
is extremely important. Historic windows should be periodically inspected and properly maintained; frequent maintenance now
can prevent headaches later. A painted wood window relies on its paint for weather protection. Without paint, the extremes of
heat, cold, sunlight and moisture can quickly act on the exterior frame and sash, damaging the wood. Therefore the routine
inspection of the windows, followed by appropriate scraping, priming and painting should be foremost in any maintenance plan.
If inspection of a window reveals repairable damage or deterioration, existing window sash and frames should be retained
and repaired, rather than replaced, whenever possible. Unlike modern metal replacement windows, historic wood units were
constructed so that damaged portions could be repaired or replaced one part at a time. A damaged window component should
be replaced with material and construction matching the original; this approach results in cost savings for the building owner.
Replacement of an entire window unit is appropriate only when it is deteriorated beyond repair. The new window should
match the original in material, finish, configuration, setback, profiles and all other visual, physical and reflective qualities.
Historic metal sash windows, both casement and double-hung, are also important features that should be retained and
repaired. In buildings such as historic industrial or institutional complexes, rows of large historic metal windows contribute to the
property's exterior character and should be repaired and retained. Steel and other metal windows have their own sets of
problems and treatments, but specific guidance is available through the SHPO.
Storefronts
Storefronts are highly visible features of historic commercial buildings and every effort should be made to preserve and
rehabilitate intact historical examples. Since facades were often changed to suit stylistic changes, the current storefront may not
be original to the building. However, many of these "later" storefronts are significant in their own right--for example,
Art Deco features on a 19th century building. These important features are a record of changes made over time within a
community or neighborhood and may reflect broad trends in economic development, architecture and settlement patterns.
General periodic inspection and maintenance is key to the long life of any storefront system. Appropriate painting, caulking
and repair should be undertaken as soon as any problems are identified. A prompt response to minor problems can prevent
major repairs later.
Historic storefront installations should be retained, even where no commercial use is proposed in the re-use. Where a
storefront is missing, restoration of the original condition is appropriate provided it is based on conclusive physical or
documentary evidence (not conjecture). If both the storefront and the basis for restoration are missing, then the use of simple,
generic and compatible storefront features is appropriate. These features typically include simple framing and panels, large glass
areas and transom units, cornices, signboards and simple doors. Appropriate materials, configurations and proportions will vary
depending upon the style and significant features of the building and any associated district.
New Construction and Related Demolition
New construction and related demolition at historic properties can be a serious preservation issue. Just as historic resources
vary, new construction should be tailored to the historic property. The SHPO can provide assistance in new construction projects
and has developed general guidelines that can be useful during project planning. The primary objective is to determine if the
property can accept the addition of a new feature without impact to the historical design, features and materials of the property.
A side or rear secondary elevation is usually the best location for additions to historic buildings. Any new addition should not
impact or change the general perception of the building's historic design. As part of this approach, the addition should be designed
to be compatible with the architectural character of the historic building, incorporating materials that complement the historic. The
real challenge, however, comes in insuring that the new addition is compatible without being a carbon copy of the historic building.
While it should be clear to the casual observer that the addition is new and not historic, the design and materials of the new
construction must respect and reflect the historic building.
New additions to other property types should be given the same consideration. New construction within an historic landscape
should be placed in the least prominent and least significant spaces. New additions - such as new vegetation, circulation, or
furnishings and objects - should be compatible with the physical and visual characteristics of the specific landscape; cookie-cutter
solutions from one location may not be appropriate in others.
Rooftop Additions
New rooftop construction is an extremely sensitive issue in a preservation project. Rooftop additions are inappropriate at
most historic properties because they can seriously change the height, profile, and overall exterior character of a building, as
well as affect the overall character of an historic landscape or historic district. Any proposed construction will be reviewed for
its overall visibility from all viewpoints. In general, a successful rooftop addition is small in scale and footprint, held away from
the building's perimeter, and visible from a limited number of vantage points. The exceptions are elevator overruns and areas of
fire refuge; such elements involve minor changes and are therefore usually acceptable.
Parking Additions
Work associated with providing parking at an historic property can be of great concern. Contemporary parking facilities--whether
surface lots or garages--can greatly alter a property's historic character and, in most cases, involves the loss of historic features
and/or materials. Any proposed parking facility, including its entries/exits, approaches and support features (lighting, security
elements), will be reviewed carefully. Emphasis will be on assessing the effect on important spaces, views, topography, vegetation
and buildings/structures.
Demolition
Demolition should be kept to an absolute minimum in any preservation project, and limited to secondary areas or areas of
extreme deterioration. Any demolition should be carefully planned to minimize impacts on historic features and materials, as well
as building floorplans or site plans.
